Last night I hosted a third-generation Newtown resident who has questions about the official version of events in Sandy Hook. About an hour after posting the interview I started panicking over the repercussions of publishing it because of the blowback others have gotten for discussing these issues. I simply don’t have the resources to defend myself if I’m faced with the same kind of attacks that have been leveled against Alex Jones, Wolfgang Halbig and Jim Fetzer.
May 20, 2022·edited May 20, 2022Liked by Nathan Stolpman
Considering that Alex Jones is still dealing with the repercussions 10 years later, your concerns have merit. However, I have never seen you take a stance on the subject, yet you are just applying the Continuous Improvement principle of "5-Why" to this subject. You keep asking why or other probing questions until you get to the root cause of the problem.
Hey dude. First off, you are the only person I know of even talking about this, so props to you on that. Why not just share this info privately to your subscribers. You can't get in as much trouble for non public content right? Anyways, love the show and will keep watching. Do you and be safe homie!
Hi, Nathan. It's me! I relished your interview with that Dynamo! The child sacrifice info fit perfectly, sadly new to me but makes perfect sense. Iwonder what Jones is thinking. Years ago I was attending about 4-6 Truther conferences. Sandy Hook was debunked at one.the woman who spoke was nervous.
Its been 10 years since the events went down. I dont think there is any reason why you cant discuss this with the disclaimer that it may be controversial and that it is up to the individual to take their own point of view. If you feel that the information is not worth sharing then there is no harm in culling bad content. Perhaps limiting it to your own website where the ramifications can be mitigated is an option for you.
However and in addition, there is a lot going on currently that is worth understanding and discussing in great detail that may be more actionable by the LTV audience. Your valuable perspective and intellect are reasons why I subscribe.
I think you made it clear that you were not taking a position, rather, you were interviewing a source. You've never said you do or don't believe it happened. That said, the lines are blurry to what is or isn't acceptable and if you think it's in your best interest to limit the distribution on this particular subject, it is completely understandable. Others may see it differently, but if it was me, I'd probably at least consider doing the same. Appreciate your show and the content you put out. The quality is consistent.
Nathan…. It’s a sad state of affairs when LTV can’t perform the service we need…. far cry from your award winning 2015 San Bernardino investigative reporting….
Considering that Alex Jones is still dealing with the repercussions 10 years later, your concerns have merit. However, I have never seen you take a stance on the subject, yet you are just applying the Continuous Improvement principle of "5-Why" to this subject. You keep asking why or other probing questions until you get to the root cause of the problem.
Keep up the great work.
Hey dude. First off, you are the only person I know of even talking about this, so props to you on that. Why not just share this info privately to your subscribers. You can't get in as much trouble for non public content right? Anyways, love the show and will keep watching. Do you and be safe homie!
Hi, Nathan. It's me! I relished your interview with that Dynamo! The child sacrifice info fit perfectly, sadly new to me but makes perfect sense. Iwonder what Jones is thinking. Years ago I was attending about 4-6 Truther conferences. Sandy Hook was debunked at one.the woman who spoke was nervous.
Its been 10 years since the events went down. I dont think there is any reason why you cant discuss this with the disclaimer that it may be controversial and that it is up to the individual to take their own point of view. If you feel that the information is not worth sharing then there is no harm in culling bad content. Perhaps limiting it to your own website where the ramifications can be mitigated is an option for you.
However and in addition, there is a lot going on currently that is worth understanding and discussing in great detail that may be more actionable by the LTV audience. Your valuable perspective and intellect are reasons why I subscribe.
~LRB
I think you made it clear that you were not taking a position, rather, you were interviewing a source. You've never said you do or don't believe it happened. That said, the lines are blurry to what is or isn't acceptable and if you think it's in your best interest to limit the distribution on this particular subject, it is completely understandable. Others may see it differently, but if it was me, I'd probably at least consider doing the same. Appreciate your show and the content you put out. The quality is consistent.
👍
Nathan…. It’s a sad state of affairs when LTV can’t perform the service we need…. far cry from your award winning 2015 San Bernardino investigative reporting….